Showing posts with label Barak Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barak Obama. Show all posts

Friday, January 16, 2009

My Post to Barack Obama's Change.gov

Here is my post to Barack Obama's Change.gov. It concerns me that we keep hearing this idotic clap trap about "looking forward as opposed to looking backwards." This is just a dumb answer being put forth by very intelligent men. Over the last eight years the laws of this nation were routinely disregarded, and our Constitution took a very serious hit.

We, as a nation, can't make things right going forward by ignoring the crimes of the recent past. As I said in my post to Change.gov, we are actually looking forward when we want the Bush Administration investigated, and prosecuted when warrented. To not do so is to take anther step towards the fall of this great Republic. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney took to many of these steps already. If all future presidents are led to believe there will be no penalty for their criminal wrongdoing, what incentive will they have to honor the law?

You can read my post below, and I ask that people go to Change.gov and vote it up, so maybe it will be read. I ask people go to Change.gov and give your thoughts, make your suggestions, and ask your questions. It is one small step to taking back this country.

Here is my post:

Barack Obama noted the other day that he believes the nation should "look forward as opposed to looking backwards." This comment came in response to a question about investigating alleged crimes committed by the Bush administration.

This answer was stupid.

It suggests that I am only interested in punishing those members of the Bush Administration. This is in no way my priority. My main concern is that by sweeping away all the crimes that may have been committed by members of the Bush Administration, and possibly even the Vice President and the President, we set prescedent. If the Bush administration has proved anything is that it is too easy for the Executive Branch to break the laws of this nation, and disregard the Constitution.

While I believe President-elect Obama to be a man of honor, this nation was not set up to just trust we will always have honorable individuals entrusted with these important possitions. Quite the contrary it was set up to expect that there would one day be men like Dick Cheney who had little regard for the Constitution or the laws of this land. Part of the problem is that the balance that the legislature was supposed to offer was not there. Our Constitution was let down by members of Congress, who did not do their job.

Now the President-elect is suggesting he will also ignore his Constitutional responsibilities. I am just one voice in a sea of people, but what truly makes this nation great is I have the right to voice my concerns. If an adminstration can be allowed to break the law, and have no fear of penalty, my rights are diminshed, and are in jeapardy of being restricted more in the future. Therefore to protect and defend the Constitution, a president must do more than just obey the Constitution himself; he must hold those who have violated the Constitution accountable. This is why the response of Mr. Biden and now Mr. Obama is stupid. The President-elect must reconsider his apparent decision to let the previous administration get away with their crimes.

Political consequences aside, it's not a decision he has the right to make.

Note: the final line was taken from today's Paul Krugman editorial.

Keith Olbermann discussed the need for Barack Obama to investigate the Bush Administration for War Crimes on Countdown with Jonathan Turley. Watch it here:

LibertyAir Blog

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Conservatives for Change

"Conservatives for Change" is a documentary project featuring Republicans and Conservatives who have started to vote for Barack Obama. These are real people, speaking in their own words. Check out more here: www.conservativesforchange.com

Watch the video here:


LibertyAir Blog

Monday, October 20, 2008

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA LEAVING CAMPAIGN TRAIL

Barack Obama is canceling nearly all his campaign events Thursday and Friday to fly to Hawaii to visit his gravely ill 85-year-old grandmother.

Our hearts and best wishes are with Senator Obama and his family.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

McCain Did Not Get Game Change

The final debate is over, and again people will be able to offer convincing arguments as to why each candidate won the debate. Barak Obama was calm, cool, and had well thought answers to all the questions, and did counter many of the attacks. John McCain came out swinging, hit Barak Obama with some strong attacks, he was aggressive and scored a few points.

However he never scored a really telling punch, and Barak Obama did not trip himself up.

McCain needed the game-changer and he didn't get it. The snorts, the heavy breathing, and the eye rolls could not have helped his message.

Barak Obama again showed that he is Presidential, that he is bright, and hopeful, and looking towards the future of our country. John McCain again showed that his time is past, that he is focused on the past.

McCain Spends Most of His Time Attacking

John McCain has spent most of his time in answering every question to attack Obama far more than articulating his own position. Watching the debate on CNN it shows that as McCain attacks Obama, his numbers go down - it's a failing tactic but it's clear that at this point John McCain has nothing else. Every McCain answer starts with an attack on Obama. Every one. He sounds angry and really frustrated. There is such a stark difference between these candidates. One has a vision... and one really is a cranky old man who can only look backwards.

Obama-Biden Tax Calculator

Barack Obama and Joe Biden will cut taxes for 95% of working families, and provide at least three times as much tax relief for middle class families as John McCain and Sarah Palin. The Obama/Biden plan provides $1,000 of tax relief for workers and new tax benefits to help families pay for college, childcare and save for retirement.

Check out the Obama tax calculator site here and share it with your friends.



LibertyAir Blog

Presidential Debate Preview:

The Huffington Post has a great preview of tonight's Presidential Debate. The stakes are high for John McCain, as we are less than three weeks away from election day. John McCain has been heightening expectations for a fight tonight, going so far to say that he is going to "Whip" Obama's "You-Know-What". But remember before last Tuesday's debate he made a similar move, suggesting to a crowd that he would "take the gloves off."

So the question is will John McCain throw caution to the wind and come out swinging at Barak Obama? Will he bring up William Ayers tonight? Or will he bring up Reverend Wright?

This is the drama of tonight, will John McCain go down swinging, or will he repeat his second debate performance? And if McCain does bring up Ayers or Wright, how will Obama respond? I think this is why people will watch tonight.

The Obama Campaign on Tonight's Debate

The Obama campaign lays out what's at stake in tonight's debate:

In tonight’s debate, Chuck Todd of NBC News says, McCain needs to “figure out how to disqualify Barack Obama.” Time Magazine’s Mark Halperin writes, “McCain will have to produce a major memorable moment.” The NY Daily News says the debate is “do-or-die for McCain’s campaign.” However they put it, people agree, John McCain needs a game-changer.

On the big issues, this debate is one last chance for John McCain to do what he has failed to do throughout this entire campaign: explain to the American people how his economic policies would be any different at all than the failed Bush agenda he has supported every step of the way. It’s his last chance to somehow convince the American people that his erratic response to this economic crisis doesn’t disqualify him from being President.

Just this weekend, John McCain vowed to “whip Obama’s you-know-what” at the debate, and he’s indicated that he’ll use Bill Ayers to attack Barack Obama. Even though Senator McCain has said he doesn’t “give a damn” about Bill Ayers, his campaign has admitted that if he talks about the economy, he’ll lose.

But perhaps the NY Times explained the peril of McCain’s negative strategy best this morning when they wrote: After several weeks in which the McCain campaign unleashed a series of strong political attacks on Mr. Obama, trying to tie him to a former 1960s radical, among other things, the poll found that more voters see Mr. McCain as waging a negative campaign than Mr. Obama. Six in 10 voters surveyed said that Mr. McCain had spent more time attacking Mr. Obama than explaining what he would do as president; by about the same number, voters said Mr. Obama was spending more of his time explaining than attacking. [NYT/CBS Poll, NY Times 10/15/08]

Senator Obama is going to use the debate to discuss his plan for the economy. That’s what he’s been doing this entire campaign. And on Monday, he built on his proposals in a new Rescue Plan for the Middle Class. That’s the kind of steady leadership and real change Americans are looking for – not John McCain’s erratic handling of the crisis, his constant character attacks, and the same Bush policies that have failed us for eight years.

But after two debates in which John McCain didn’t mention the middle class once –
and after his campaign declared openly that they want to turn the page on talking about the economy – the real question is not how many attacks McCain can land in the debate, but whether he can finally communicate a vision to turn this economy around.

And while McCain has promised to attack Obama in the debate, every minute that he ignores the economy and the middle class is not just a minute wasted but time spent on attacks that even some of those closest to him have said don’t work.

Analysis of Barak Obama's Rescue Package

I read this article on Barak Obama's rescue package over at the Young Turks, and thought it was a really good analysis of theeconomic plan

Obama's Economic Rescue Package So On The Mark It Would Be A True Game Changer, In A Good Way
by Ben F. Terton "The Moderate Independent"

Half a decade. That's how long I've waited to write this article.

For half a decade the only articles I've been able to write were the ones that explained that, despite "expert" commentary to the contrary, the nation was headed toward a major economic collapse. And then that the collapse was beginning. And then to repeat, yes, really, there's going to be a collapse. And then, finally, I guess now you see what I meant.

The reason I've been able to predict exactly what was going to happen to the economy half a decade ahead of time was not because I'm psychic. It was because during that period, with Republican conservatives in control of the government, there were no significant changes of policy. And so the disastrous course that was set beginning with the first round of Bush tax cuts just trickled on and on, like a slow motion bullet headed toward the nation's heart but with the nation pinned there by the GOP, blindfolded by media nonsense, and so doomed by an easily escapable problem.

Any significant change of policy during that time could have headed off this disaster. But neither Republican nor Democrat ever really hit the mark.

Until now.

Senator Obama's plan was shocking for many reasons. So far ahead in the race, it was unexpected that he would release such a bold, detailed plan. But more than that, it was truly shocking to see, for the first time in a generation, a politician hit a mark so directly on the head. Delivering exactly to the true middle class, rather than to either the poorer people or the richer, Obama's simple, relatively cheap economic rescue plan, if enacted, would immediately and significantly alter the course of the American economy for the better.

Here's why this plan blows all previous ones away.

The first part is pretty simple and only somewhat significant. His offer of tax cuts directly tied to the creation of new jobs - offering $3000 per new job created in America. For years one of the things I pointed out as a flaw in the conservative dogma was that they claimed giving tax cuts to businesses would create jobs, but they never attached any mechanism to the cuts that made it so. They simply handed money to companies, which could decide to use the money for bonuses for their CEO's - which is what they did - rather than create jobs. If they truly wanted to use tax cuts to business to create jobs, I wrote for years, there had to be something in the cuts that required them to be used for hiring.

Obama's plan does exactly that. And notice the last part of his plan - "$3000 per new job created in America." Previous cuts allowed companies to spend their cash overseas. Obama explicitly stops this.

What you see here is a fundamental shift - Obama is actually looking out for America and for the American people. The Republicans were not stupid. They knew if you just handed cuts to businesses without specifying what the money had to be used for, it would go to bonuses and overseas projects. They just didn't care. They were the rich CEO's and they just wanted companies to get richer.

What Obama proposes in this part is simple, but massively different. For the first time in years, the American people are not having their hands tied behind their back while the government spits directly in their face. No lies, no games, no looking the other way. Barack Obama knew what needed to be done, but didn't put his trust in businesses, as conservatives do. He, in effect, instituted oversight and regulation all within a tax cut. And with that he got at the fundamental flaw of the conservative economic scheme: the idea that businesses act with America's best interest in mind, rather than for the profit of their executives and stock holders, which we all know is actually the case.

This part of Obama's plan is very nice. But what he came up with next was not only brilliant, but the most significantly positive step one could have imagined to immediately fix what is broken in the American economy - and in such a way that it has no real downside.

Barack's plan would allow people to withdraw 15% of their retirement funds, up to $10,000, in 2008 and again in 2009.

Now why is this such a big deal? And when I say big deal, I mean so big this could single-handedly save the American economy and head off depression and collapse.

Here's the rub: the average American family currently owes just under $10,000 in credit card debt.

What was destroying the American economy - and going to continue to destroy it for years - was that the American people weren't just spent out, they were overspent. After decades of spending more than they actually had thanks to easy credit, not only were they going to have to cut spending to get back to what they could afford, but all across the nation, people were completely slamming the door on spending to focus on trying to pay down all the debt they had accumulated.

Now with the numbers we've been hearing lately, $10,000 might not seem that much. But for your average middle class family, to pay that off while still getting by would literally mean years - two to five years - of eliminating virtually all non-essential spending. Cars, vacations, even going out to dinner, all things big and little were getting cut from household budgets left and right. With 2/3 of the American economy consumer spending, this was the problem that was destroying our nation.

Now look at Barack's plan. A family can, without penalty, immediately take $10,000 from their IRA and, instantly - instead of crimping and cutting for 4 years - have that debt be gone. And for those a little deeper in, they could do it a second time right after January, since it's allowed in 2008 and 2009.

There are a number of very important things to notice about this plan: unlike a tax cut stimulus plan, this doesn't cost the government a massive amount of money the nation would have to borrow. This plan allows people to help themselves get out of the mess they made. And, at the same time, it both:
1) 1 injects a bunch of cash into the economy, particularly helping fend off bank collapses by having people be able to pay off their debts - all without government borrowing - and,

2) gets people instantly out of the holes they are in, enabling them to begin spending again, and so instantly reviving every layer of the economy, from the corner pizza store to the car dealer.

The best part of this again, like with the first part of Barack's plan, is that more than just being a new policy, it is an important change of philosophy and a more advanced, doubly positive solution. Rather than the government bailing out those in trouble, this allows people to be bailed out but instead by themselves. Beyond this being better for the nation's economy, it is the philosophy of self-reliance and responsibility.

Most notably, this plan, unlike previous plans offered by Democrats, which helped only the poorer among us, or by Republicans, which helped only the richer among us, this plan directly hits the mark of helping the one group that always gets missed: the true middle class. If you are poor, this part of the plan won't help you at all. You won't have much of a 401(K), if any, and so won't have any funds to draw on. And if you are rich, $10,000 won't mean much one way or another.

But for the hard working people in the middle, people earning typically from the $30K's all the way up to $200K, this will be a lifesaver and game changer for each and every household. Even for families that can only withdraw $2000, that would still be years worth of paying down credit cards, since families with less would be able to pay less each month, and would be caught in the credit card interest cycle. Suddenly, boom, $2000 gone in 2008, another $2000 in 2009. Back in the game.

And for the others who can take more, they can either knock out credit card debt or, for those who mortgage woes, use that $10,000 a year to stay afloat for a while - $10,000 can buy a lot of time for a mortgage holder.

And again, since the funds are personal funds and not a tax handout, it is like a massive stimulus program and bank rescue program combined with no real cost to the nation whatsoever.

That is true brilliance.

This part of the plan could put people back on their feet in an instant and save countless banks and lenders by enabling people who would have otherwise gone bust to meet their obligations.
The only question anyone could have about this plan would be won't it hurt at retirement time? But truly, if everyone keeps crimping their spending for years to pay down this debt instead of doing it the way Barack's plan does, so many people would lose their jobs due to economic retraction that they would be far worse off come retirement time.

It's been a long time since I've been able to write an article that had any positive economic news in it. It's been a long run of dire and dark. But now there is hope. If this plan is enacted, combined with Obama's claim that he would launch an all out drive to build a new alternative energy economy, not only can America avoid a massive depression, but America could pull out of this recession in rather short order and, even better, climb to economic heights never seen before by bringing home all the wealth that's been going over to the Middle Eastern oil cartels, Russia, and Venezuela.

The third part of Obama's plan is also very sharp. State and local governments are in dire straights. Declining property tax, etc are sending numerous of them toward bankruptcy. Obama's plan would set up an emergency loan agency just for state and local governments. You know where they've had to go before? To a company called AIG - yes, that one we've had to bail out twice now, while it spends half a million on posh retreats. No more would local governments have to go to AIG - nor go bankrupt.

Again, philosophically, Obama is ending the era of putting America's trust in business. No more trusting AIG to back our governments. We are instead going to trust our government over the businesses. A fundamental shift, and not a moment too soon.

The last part of Obama's plan is a bit of a snoozer - a 90-day freeze on foreclosures. Not something too exciting one way or another. But it does buy some time for the other parts of the plan to be enacted, as well as for people to make plans for dealing with their mortgage situations.
It can not be overstated how important and miraculous this plan rolled out by Barack Obama is. And for a candidate who was far enough ahead in the polls that he could have played it safe and avoided putting any plan out there, it was a brave move, and much to the nation's benefit.
Politically, by truly putting tangible economic turnaround out there for the entire American middle class - pending the election of Obama and Democrats so they can pass this bill right after the election - Obama has won the pocketbooks, and likely the hearts and minds of millions of middle class voters. They say people always vote their pocketbooks. For millions, this plan would lift misery and stress and replace it with a return to normal life, with no bill left to pay down the road. With a vote for Barack meaning $10,000 will instantly be put in their pockets, it is hard to imagine anything but an even more massive swing toward Obama's candidacy by middle class voters. Look for a possible bluing of many currently red states, from the plain states to parts of the south.

I don't know where this idea came from for Obama - if it was Warren Buffet or another advisor who gave it to him. But for Obama to choose the plan that exactly hit the mark, and in the gentlest, smartest possible way, he has shown in one of America's most desperate moments ever that he has the vision and leadership to right the nation's ship amidst the wildest storm.
Bravo.

And thank you, Barack, for at last allowing me to write an article about a potential positive development for the American economy.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Barack Obama on the Economy

With the stock market crashing, and the world economy under enormous strain, Barak Obama spoke about the economic crisis in Chillicothe, Ohio, calling on all Americans to appreciate the severity of the situation and come together to solve it. At the same time John McCain is running around accusing Senator Obama of being a terrorist friend.

This is the choice America has Obama is talking about the issues people actually care about, and doing it in the form of a true leader.


LibertyAir Blog

Obama Knew It Was Coming All Along

In late July, Barack Obama predicted John McCain's attack strategy, and John McCain's campaign howled in protest. I guess it turns out that Obama was right about McCain's attacks. As it turns out, he knew McCain better than McCain knew McCain.

The Jed Report has found this great video of Obama making his prediction>


LibertyAir Blog

OBAMA: THE MARKETS PLUNGE AND ALL MCCAIN CAN DO IS STOKE "ANGER AND DIVISION"

Politico Reports:
Barack Obama attacked John McCain Friday for launching a "barrage of nasty insinuations and attacks" as the stock market drops tumbles.

"Even as we face the most serious economic crisis of our time, even as you are worried about keeping your jobs or paying your bills or staying in your homes, my opponent's campaign announced last week that they plan to 'turn the page' on the discussion about our economy so they can spend the final weeks of this election attacking me instead," Obama said during a speech in Chillicothe, Ohio.

From the prepared remarks:

It's easy to rile up a crowd by stoking anger and division. But that's not what we need right now in the United States. The times are too serious. The challenges are too great. The American people aren't looking for someone who can divide this country -- they're looking for someone who will lead it. We're in a serious crisis -- now, more than ever, it is time to put country ahead of politics. Now, more than ever, it is time to bring change to Washington so that it works for the people of this country that we love.

I know my opponent is worried about his campaign. But that's not what I'm concerned about. I'm thinking about the Americans losing their jobs, and their homes, and their life savings. We can't afford four more years of the economic theory that says we should give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity
trickles down to everyone else.

General Petraeus agrees with Barack Obama

The Washington Independent is reporting that McCain's greatest living hero General Petraeus agrees with Barack Obama about the question of whether the United States should meet with hostile enemies. This week General Petraeus gave a talk at the ultra conservative Heritage Foundation in which he basically echoed Barack Obama's views on negotiating with hostile foreign leaders -- views that McCain has repeatedly subjected to criticism and ridicule.

Asked by a questioner specifically about the disagreement on this topic that McCain and Obama had at Tuesday night's debate, Petraeus demurred a bit, but said:

"I do think you have to talk to enemies."

"I'm not trying to get into the middle of domestic politics," Petraeus also said, "but I mean what we did do in Iraq ultimately was sit down with some of those that were shooting at us. What we tried to do was identify those who might be reconcilable."

Petraeus' comments were reported on by Spencer Ackerman and were noted elsewhere, but really deserve way more attention. TPM went to the video on Heritage's site to get a longer transcript, and sure enough, they showed that the context shows that Petraeus was more or less backing up Obama's point of view.

As TPM points out:
What Petraeus said isn't a perfect endorsement of Obama's views -- he didn't specifically discuss Iran, and the question of "no preconditions" didn't come up -- but it's pretty darn close. That's because it's as clear as day that the context specifically was the debate between Obama and McCain on this topic on Tuesday night. During that exchange, the candidates clashed on whether to meet with the leaders of Iran, and the questioner at Heritage posed the subject about talking to enemies specifically in that light.

In an interview that aired on CBS, John McCain, when asked which three living people he'd like to have dinner with most, promptly chose General Petraeus. McCain frequently hails Petraeus as an "American hero." Do you think John McCain might change his view?

Me neither...

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

The Second Presidential Debate

Instant Polls Find Obama Won Debate

CNN poll of debate viewers: Obama 54%, McCain 30%
CBS poll of uncommitted voters: Obama 39%, McCain 27%

Taegan Goddard's Political Wire

Tonight's debate wasn't even close. Sen. Barack Obama ran away with it -- particularly when speaking about the economy and health care. Talking about his mother's death from cancer was very powerful. On nearly every issue, Obama was more substantive, showed more compassion and was more presidential.

In contrast, Sen. John McCain was extremely erratic. Sometimes he was too aggressive (referring to Obama as "that one.") Other times, he just couldn't answer the question (on how he would ask Americans to sacrifice.) And his random attempts at jokes (hair transplants?) were just bad.

Tom Brokaw was terrible as moderator. His fixation with the rules -- particularly when the candidates were not complaining -- was distracting and a disservice to everyone. The format didn't work very well, but Brokaw made it worse.

Other reactions:

Andrew Sullivan: "This was, I think, a mauling: a devastating and possibly electorally fatal debate for McCain... I've watched a lot of debates and participated in many. I love debate and was trained as a boy in the British system to be a debater. I debated dozens of times at Oxofrd. All I can say is that, simply on terms of substance, clarity, empathy, style and authority, this has not just been an Obama victory. It has been a wipe-out. It has been about as big a wipe-out as I can remember in a presidential debate. It reminds me of the 1992 Clinton-Perot-Bush debate. I don't really see how the McCain campaign survives this."

Ezra Klein: "Tonight was supposed to be John McCain's night, but it was the first clear debate win Obama has scored over the course of this campaign -- including the primary. McCain, as it turned out, was badly disadvantaged by the format. This debate was more physical than previous encounters. And McCain, for reasons of age and injuries and height, has a less commanding physical presence than Obama."

Mark Halperin: "McCain spent much of the evening trying to define Obama on his terms, but never broke all the way through."

Marc Ambinder: "CW says that John McCain had a 90 minute window to turn his campaign around - to put into play the McCain Resurgence Strategy, if you will, and if that's the CW threshold, I don't think McCain met it."

Quick Take On the Debate

The debate has been pretty firework free. Which is a win for Obama, there has been no game changer.

Obama Add: The Subject

The New Obama add hits John McCain for trying to change the subject from the economy with smears and lies.


LibertyAir Blog

Monday, October 06, 2008

John McCain is Just a Liar

That is all he has left in this campaign; he has no vision of the future, no plan for this crisis. The New York Times documents all the falsehoods in McCain's most recent attack speech. The Times shows that many of McCain's charges relating to the economic meltdown, taxation and health care contained inaccuracies or exaggerations of his own position or Mr. Obama’s.

Sunday, October 05, 2008

Barak Obama: You can't turn the page on the economy

Barak Obama is bound and determined to not be "Swift Boated" this election cycle. He went after John McCain during a campaign speech in Ashville North Carolina. Barak Obama declared that, "We are in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression and John McCain wants to 'turn the page' and ignore the economy."

This is the message that Barak Obama has to keep pounding. Make every attack by McCain and Palin look childish, foolish, and senseless. Make sure the narrative is that McCain is desperate, and has no message of hope, or plan for the future.


LibertyAir Blog

Obama Add: John McCain voted to RAISE TAXES 477 Times

A great counter to the McCain campaign's tired accusation that Obama will raise your taxes.

Going McNasty All the Time

News came out this weekend that McCain campaign officials are saying that they plan to begin a new hard hitting slime campaign after Tuesday’s debate that will tie Obama to convicted money launderer Tony Rezko and former Weathermen radical William Ayers. McCain's television ads were already pretty negative and attacking, as TPM Election Central reported, "Nearly 100 Percent Devoted To Attack Ads", but now they are going just dirty.

The Washington Post reports:

Senator John McCain and his Republican allies are readying a newly aggressive assault on Sen. Barack Obama's character, believing that to win in November they
must shift the conversation back to questions about the Democrat's judgment, honesty and personal associations, several top Republicans said.With just a month to go until Election Day, McCain's team has decided that its emphasis on the senator's biography as a war hero, experienced lawmaker and straight-talking maverick is insufficient to close a growing gap with Obama. The Arizonan's campaign is also eager to move the conversation away from the economy, an issue that strongly favors Obama and has helped him to a lead in many recent polls.

"We're going to get a little tougher," a senior Republican operative said, indicating that a fresh batch of television ads is coming. "We've got to question this guy's associations. Very soon. There's no question that we have to change the subject here," said the operative, who was not authorized to discuss strategy and spoke on the condition of anonymity.


Obama's response to this news is a preemptive strike with a television ad hitting John McCain for being "erratic" and "out of touch", and calls him on the smear campaign the McCain campaign is planning.

LibertyAir Blog